AI Generated by Fortune India
Supreme Court refuses to stay UPI MDR above ₹2,000, seeks Centre, RBI, NPCI responseSeptember 28, 2026, 17:49 IST
Loading AI Hub...
Disclaimer : Certain content on this page, including summaries, timelines, FAQs, glossaries, highlights, insights, and other supplementary informational features, maybe generated or assisted by artificial intelligence tools. While reasonable efforts are made to review and verify such content, AI generated output may occasionally contain errors, omissions or inconsistencies. Readers are advised to independently verify any information before relying upon them for professional, legal, financial, medical or other decisions. The publisher along with its affiliates and contributors do not warrant accuracy of AI-generated content and disclaim any liability, loss or damage arising from its use.

Supreme Court refuses to stay UPI MDR above ₹2,000, seeks Centre, RBI, NPCI response

/2 min read

ADVERTISEMENT

The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Anjan Datta challenging the Centre's September 14 notification and the MDR framework announced on September 15.
Supreme Court refuses to stay
Supreme Court of India Credits: Fortune India

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to grant an interim stay on the imposition of merchant discount rate (MDR) on specified UPI person-to-merchant (P2M) transactions above ₹2,000, which is set to take effect from October 15.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notices to the Centre, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), seeking their responses within four weeks.

Sign up for Fortune India's ad-free experience
Enjoy uninterrupted access to premium content and insights.

The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Anjan Datta challenging the Centre's September 14 notification and the MDR framework announced on September 15.

SC questions legal basis for MDR

During the hearing, the bench sought clarity on the legal basis for imposing the charge and questioned whether the MDR should be treated as a tax or a fee.

“Is it a tax or a fee? If not a fee, then what is the executive basis for making this expropriation?” the bench asked.

Additional Solicitor General N Venkataraman, appearing for the Centre, said the charge was neither a tax nor a fee and that the government would not receive the money.

“It is neither a tax nor a fee,” he said, adding that the charge was a settlement fee between payment aggregators and banks.

“The government is several steps away from this money,” Venkataraman said.

The bench asked the Centre to file a short counter affidavit explaining the basis for the framework, observing that the issue was “less a legal issue and more a technical issue”.

October 15 rollout remains in place

The petitioner sought an interim stay on the MDR framework after the court issued notice. However, the bench declined to grant one.

This means the framework remains scheduled to come into effect from October 15.

The government has introduced a 0.4% MDR on specified P2M UPI transactions above ₹2,000. The MDR will be capped at ₹300 for payments of ₹75,000 and above.

Essential and thin-margin sectors such as railways, telecom, insurance, fuel and agricultural inputs will attract a flat ₹5 MDR on transactions above ₹2,000.

Payments involving mutual funds, securities, stockbrokers and dealers will attract MDR of 0.02%, also capped at ₹300.

P2P payments remain free

Person-to-person (P2P) UPI transactions will continue to attract zero charges irrespective of transaction size. The Centre told the court that 96% of users of the payment system would remain exempt.

“The Government of India is not taking even a single rupee out of it,” Venkataraman told the bench.

The petitioner has challenged the framework on grounds including lack of adequate statutory safeguards, transparency and public consultation. It has also questioned the distinction between UPI transactions and RuPay debit card payments and sought safeguards for micro and small enterprises.

The plea has sought quashing or suspension of the MDR framework or, alternatively, reconsideration after transparent consultation, publication of empirical data and an impact assessment.