AI Generated by Fortune India
‘India does not allow monopoly’: Scindia tears into Musk’s Starlink allegationsOctober 9, 2026, 13:05 IST
Loading AI Hub...
Disclaimer : Certain content on this page, including summaries, timelines, FAQs, glossaries, highlights, insights, and other supplementary informational features, maybe generated or assisted by artificial intelligence tools. While reasonable efforts are made to review and verify such content, AI generated output may occasionally contain errors, omissions or inconsistencies. Readers are advised to independently verify any information before relying upon them for professional, legal, financial, medical or other decisions. The publisher along with its affiliates and contributors do not warrant accuracy of AI-generated content and disclaim any liability, loss or damage arising from its use.

‘India does not allow monopoly’: Scindia tears into Musk’s Starlink allegations

/2 min read

ADVERTISEMENT

Minister says the government’s position is clear, and the regulatory process applies uniformly to all players.
‘India does not allow monopoly
Jyotiraditya Scindia, Minister of Communications (file image) Credits: Sanjay Rawat

Union Communications Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia on Friday rejected Elon Musk’s allegations that Starlink is being held back from launching in India by powerful business interests, saying India does not allow monopolies and that all satellite communication players must meet the same regulatory and security requirements.

“There is a lot of conversation about one specific company, but three companies have got satcom licences,” Scindia said during a media interaction on at the India Mobile Congress 2026.

Sign up for Fortune India's ad-free experience
Enjoy uninterrupted access to premium content and insights.

Scindia said Starlink, Jio Satellite Communications and Eutelsat OneWeb have already secured licences, while Amazon is also interested in obtaining one. However, obtaining a licence does not automatically allow a company to commence commercial operations, he said. “India does not allow a monopoly in any sector,” Scindia said, adding that each licensed operator would have to independently fulfil the required security conditions and other milestones before beginning operations.

His comments came a day after Musk accused “certain oligarchs” of blocking Starlink’s India launch in order to maintain a “monopolistic chokehold” over consumers.

Scindia said the government’s position is clear and that the regulatory process applied uniformly to all players. He said spectrum charges were yet to be finalised and that security compliance was being assessed individually. “Once the revenue charges system is finalised, once each one of these parties, party A, B, and C, all three, individually based on their achievement of milestones with regard to security concerns and prerequisites, have fulfilled the requirements, then obviously they can start operations,” he said.

The minister also pushed back against the suggestion that Starlink was being singled out, saying three companies had already received licences and that another company was pursuing the process.

Mittal says OneWeb is waiting too

Bharti Enterprises chairman Sunil Bharti Mittal also sought to counter the suggestion that Starlink alone was facing delays. Speaking on the sidelines at IMC, Mittal said Bharti-backed Eutelsat OneWeb was itself awaiting approvals to begin satellite services in India. “We’re waiting for our own approvals,” Mittal said, adding that satellite services from the group would begin “hopefully soon” in India.

The comments came after Musk’s allegations and as the government said Starlink, OneWeb and Jio Satcom were broadly at the same regulatory stage, with security assessments underway.

Scindia said the government remained “technology agnostic” and its role was to create a predictable regulatory framework that allows customers to choose between competing technologies and service providers.

Follow Fortune IndiaNews, insights and conversations that matter, on your favourite platforms.