AI Generated by Fortune India
OFCD case: SEBI moves SC against SAT relief to SICCL managers, company secretaryJune 13, 2026, 16:26 IST
Loading AI Hub...
Disclaimer : Certain content on this page, including summaries, timelines, FAQs, glossaries, highlights, insights, and other supplementary informational features, maybe generated or assisted by artificial intelligence tools. While reasonable efforts are made to review and verify such content, AI generated output may occasionally contain errors, omissions or inconsistencies. Readers are advised to independently verify any information before relying upon them for professional, legal, financial, medical or other decisions. The publisher along with its affiliates and contributors do not warrant accuracy of AI-generated content and disclaim any liability, loss or damage arising from its use.

OFCD case: SEBI moves SC against SAT relief to SICCL managers, company secretary

/2 min read

ADVERTISEMENT

SEBI challenges SAT’s exoneration of Sahara India Commercial Corporation managers and company secretary in landmark OFCD fundraising case before Supreme Court
THIS STORY FEATURES
OFCD case: SEBI moves SC against SAT relief to SICCL managers, company secretary
 Credits: Getty Images

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has moved the Supreme Court partially challenging a Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) order granting relief to four managers and the company secretary of Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd (SICCL).

A vacation bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice V Mohana is scheduled to hear the plea of SEBI on June 18.

Sign up for Fortune India's ad-free experience
Enjoy uninterrupted access to premium content and insights.

On March 9, the SAT upheld regulatory action by the SEBI against SICCL and dismissed appeals filed by the company and its directors in connection with the alleged illegal issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures (OFCDs).

The three-member SAT bench had ruled that the OFCDs issued by SICCL between 1998 and 2008 constituted a public offer, bringing them within SEBI's regulatory jurisdiction.

The tribunal had said that the SICCL mobilised around Rs 14,106 crore from nearly 1.98 crore investors through these debentures during the period. It also held that such a large-scale mobilisation of funds from such a huge number of investors could not be treated as a private placement, as claimed by the company.

While dismissing the appeals filed by SICCL and its directors, the tribunal had allowed a separate appeal filed by four managers and the company secretary, while holding that as employees they could not be held liable for the company's actions.

It also noted that the prospectus had been signed by the company secretary pursuant to powers of attorney granted by the directors, who remained responsible as principals for the acts of their agent.

The SEBI has now challenged that part of the ruling before the apex court.

The case pertains to an October 2018 order passed by SEBI directing the company to refund the money raised through the debentures, disclose details of its inventory, and debarring certain officials from accessing the securities market.

What is the case

The Sahara OFCD case is among India's most significant securities market disputes. In 2012, the Supreme Court directed Sahara Group companies to refund more than ₹24,000 crore collected from investors through OFCDs, holding that the fundraising exercise fell within SEBI's regulatory ambit. The matter has since seen multiple legal proceedings over recovery, investor repayments and the liability of company officials.