AI Generated by Fortune India
Sebi lifts trading ban on JPMorgan unit in alleged CAS manipulation caseSeptember 9, 2026, 19:15 IST
Loading AI Hub...
Disclaimer : Certain content on this page, including summaries, timelines, FAQs, glossaries, highlights, insights, and other supplementary informational features, maybe generated or assisted by artificial intelligence tools. While reasonable efforts are made to review and verify such content, AI generated output may occasionally contain errors, omissions or inconsistencies. Readers are advised to independently verify any information before relying upon them for professional, legal, financial, medical or other decisions. The publisher along with its affiliates and contributors do not warrant accuracy of AI-generated content and disclaim any liability, loss or damage arising from its use.

Sebi lifts trading ban on JPMorgan unit in alleged CAS manipulation case

/2 min read

ADVERTISEMENT

The regulator has allowed Copthall Mauritius Investment Ltd., a Mauritius-based unit of JPMorgan, to resume trading in India after the firm deposited ₹2.96 crore linked to alleged gains from trades during the newly introduced CAS.
Sebi lifts trading ban on JPMo
Sebi barred Copthall Mauritius and Mansi Share and Stock Broking on August 19 Credits: Getty Images

India’s capital market regulator has reportedly lifted the trading ban on a unit of JPMorgan Chase & Co. after the firm deposited ₹2.96 crore linked to alleged gains from trades in the newly introduced Closing Auction Session (CAS).

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on August 19 barred Copthall Mauritius Investment Ltd., a Mauritius-based unit of JPMorgan, along with Mumbai-based Mansi Share and Stock Broking from accessing the capital markets. The action followed allegations of market manipulation during the BSE’s closing auction on August 13. Sebi also ordered the impounding of the alleged wrongful gains.

Sign up for Fortune India's ad-free experience
Enjoy uninterrupted access to premium content and insights.

According to a report, both entities have now been allowed to access India’s capital markets again after depositing amounts linked to the alleged gains. The Sebi investigation, however, will continue.

Why Sebi barred the two entities

The case relates to trading activity during the Sensex weekly derivatives expiry on August 13. According to Sebi’s findings, Copthall placed aggressive buy orders in Sensex constituent stocks during the auction, while Mansi placed large sell orders.

Sebi alleged that the trades affected the indicative equilibrium price used to determine the closing prices of stocks. This could have benefited positions held in the derivatives market. Mansi later cancelled a substantial portion of its sell orders, according to the regulator.

Sebi estimated the alleged gains at about ₹2.96 crore for Copthall and ₹71.6 lakh for Mansi, taking the combined amount to around ₹3.68 crore. The restrictions were imposed pending further investigation.

The episode has also raised concerns over the functioning of CAS, which came into effect on August 3 as a new mechanism for determining closing prices of eligible securities. Under the new system, the closing price discovered through the auction is also used as the settlement price for derivative contracts on expiry.

Sebi to review derivative settlement rules

Last week, Sebi said that it would review the methodology used to determine derivative settlement prices after receiving feedback from market participants during the first month of CAS operations. The regulator said it may propose changes and plans to issue a consultation paper.

The review comes amid concerns over sharp price movements around expiry sessions and differences between auction-derived closing prices and prevailing market prices. Recent trading sessions have also seen increased volatility during the closing auction, adding to concerns over the interaction between the cash-market auction and derivatives settlement.

CAS was introduced to improve price discovery by bringing greater participation into the closing process. However, its first month of operation has prompted Sebi and market participants to examine whether the mechanism, particularly its link to derivatives settlement, needs further changes.